Cases 1 - 10 of 140
Ross v. Acevedo
as 2:2024cv00864
Plaintiff:
Michael James Ross
Defendant:
Art Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. Luna et al
as 2:2024cv00849
Defendant:
Delia C. Luna, Officer Evan J. Scott, Kevin Rambosk and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. Luna et al
as 2:2024cv00718
Defendant:
Police Chief Kevin J. Rambosk, Officer Troy A. Menning, Officer Evan J. Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. AEXLAB Inc.
as 1:2024cv22982
Plaintiff:
Ian Ross and Array Bercov
Defendant:
AEXLAB Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01230
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00268
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA)
Jackson et al v. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida et al
as 0:2024cv60935
Defendant:
FRANCO SMITH, Ronald Magno, ROBERT DEITRICH and others
Plaintiff:
MIKE GABELUS, Scott Ross and JAYANNA JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Konan v. Saydah et al
as 6:2024cv00886
Defendant:
Saydah Law Firm, Neil A. Saydah, Joel Ramos, II and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Konan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
