Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Caplan v. ANNA ROYZMAN, P.A. et al
as 9:2019cv81618
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
ANNA ROYZMAN, P.A., DJ&G REALTY HOLDING COMPANY, LLC and ANNA ROYZMAN, P.A. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as PROSPERITY DENTAL GROUP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Chambers v. Rent Prosper, LLC
as 6:2019cv01289
Plaintiff:
Delroy A. Chambers, Jr.
Defendant:
Rent Prosper, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Moulton v. Prosper et al
as 0:2018cv61260
Plaintiff:
Jevaughn Moulton
Defendant:
Guy Prosper , Taylor Anderson , John Yulfo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Caplan v. PROSPER AUTO OF FLORIDA, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv22030
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
PROSPER AUTO OF FLORIDA, LLC and JONATHON KNOWLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Prosperous v. Todd et al
as 8:2017cv01375
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Prosperous
Defendant:
Kimberly Todd, Sherwood Coleman, James Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prosperous v. Todd et al
as 8:2017cv00996
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Love Prosperous
Defendant:
Kimberly Todd , Jack Hellinger , James Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prosperous v. Pinellas County Sheriff et al
as 8:2017cv00860
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Love Prosperous
Defendant:
Pinellas County Sheriff's Department and Department of Children and Families
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prosper v. Martin
as 1:2017cv20323
Plaintiff:
Edeline Julmisse Prosper
Defendant:
Anthony Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv23981
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2015cv81576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
