Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Barberi v. Julio & Sons Tires Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv22135
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
Julio & Sons Tires Corp. and Perrine 9911 Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Cesar v. Department of Justice
as 6:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Son Oswald Cesar
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Cesar v. Dept. of Justice
as 6:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Son Oswald Cesar
Defendant:
Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cesar v. Dept of Justice
as 6:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Son Oswald Cesar
Defendant:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Son Vuong v. William Hall, Jr., et al
as 23-13737
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SON THI VUONG
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM DEAN HALL, JR., JOSHUA C. CANTON, TERRY P. LEWIS and others
Caplan v. Puya and Son Enterprises II Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv62104
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
PUYA AND SON ENTERPRISES II INC. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as MR. B'S AUTO REPAIR, 561 FLAGLER AVENUE LLC and Puya and Son Enterprises II Inc. doing business as MR. B'S AUTO REPAIR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23969
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Cesar v. GLS Property
as 6:2023cv01734
Plaintiff:
Son Oswald Cesar
Defendant:
GLS Property
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yi et al v. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2023cv01587
Plaintiff:
Jin Mee Yi and Son Oswald Cesar
Defendant:
Department of Justice and U.S. Courthouse, NY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
