Cases 111 - 120 of 77,528
Douglas v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Marion)
as 5:2024cv00261
Petitioner:
Christopher Jason Douglas
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chism v. Long et al
as 8:2024cv01231
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Chism
Defendant:
Janet C. Long, Brian Scott, Charles Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOGAN v. DIXON
as 3:2024cv00229
Petitioner:
TIYARI R HOGAN
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOULLARD v. JACOBSEN et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
RANDY L WOULLARD
Defendant:
K JACOBSEN, R F CALDWELL, CHARLES RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. SPEARS et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
JAMES T MURZIKE
Defendant:
S SPEARS, GODDARD, MCMATH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GALINDEZ v. LOPEZ-RIVERA et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
RALPH GALINDEZ
Defendant:
LUIS A LOPEZ-RIVERA, M FREHN and D MADDOX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sebastian III, George v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv21975
Plaintiff:
George J. Sebastian III
Defendant:
United States of America, Merrick B. Garland and Markenzy Lapointe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Charles, Jones v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2024cv80655
Plaintiff:
Paul Charles
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Walker v. Peters
as 6:2024cv00943
Petitioner:
Richard Barrett Dale Walker
Respondent:
Warden, RRM Orlando
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
