Cases 151 - 160 of 77,528
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Smalling v. Charlotte County Jail
as 2:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Wesley Smalling
Defendant:
Charlotte County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles, Paul v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2024cv80414
Plaintiff:
Paul Charles
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KENDRICK v. WHISTLER et al
as 1:2024cv00055
Defendant:
RICHARD OLETO CHANG, DARLA KAY WHISTLER, JUSTIN AUSTIN TORRES and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO LAMONT KENDRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv21253
Plaintiff:
Reginald Walter
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MUJICA v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
KERVIN MORENO MUJICA, SR
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and LAURA ANNE ROSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hosley, Odis v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv80401
Plaintiff:
Odis Hosley
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
WALKER v. PATE
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
AMOS WALKER
Defendant:
PATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
JESSE ALAN WALKER
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, JAMES COKER, TIMOTHY NOLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. ARCH
as 2:2024cv14158
Plaintiff:
ROGER VON EVANS
Defendant:
CAREN L ARCH, BROWN, RICKY DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
