Cases 11 - 20 of 34
MOODY v. EDELEN et al
as 4:2020cv00237
Defendant:
MR KING, BRYANT GOODWIN and CHRISTOPHER EDELEN
Plaintiff:
JESSE EDWARD MOODY, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCROGGINS v. SWINDLE et al
as 4:2020cv00156
Defendant:
CARTER, MCKEEN, MICHAEL W SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN P SCROGGINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHARP v. MILLER et al
as 4:2020cv00074
Plaintiff:
KEITH MAURICE SHARP
Defendant:
L KEEN, BRENT X THURMOND, ASHLEY MOODY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOODY v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2019cv00508
Defendant:
BRYANT GOODWIN, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CHRISTOPHER EDELEN
Plaintiff:
JESSE EDWARD MOODY, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francis v. Godwin, et al.
as 3:2019cv00883
Respondent:
United States of America, John Goodwin, Florida Attorney General and others
Petitioner:
Jean-Pierre Martin Francis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Small v. Charlotte County Jail et al
as 2:2016cv00820
Plaintiff:
Darrell Small
Defendant:
Charlotte County Jail, Charlotte County Commission, FNU Goodwine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLVILLE v. SANTA ROSA SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 3:2015cv00436
Plaintiff:
DAVID CRAIG COLVILLE
Defendant:
SANTA ROSA SHERIFFS OFFICE, SANTA ROSA STATE ATTORNEYS OFFICE, DAVIS GOODWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACKMON v. MCNEIL et al.
as 5:2013cv00358
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEVON BLACKMON
Defendant:
WALTER MCNEIL, BAINES, SCHULA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Prummell et al
as 2:2013cv00429
Plaintiff:
Damien D. Jones
Defendant:
Bill Prummell, FNU Carroll, FNU Goodwine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Prummell et al
as 2:2013cv00426
Plaintiff:
Damien D. Jones
Defendant:
Bill Prummell, FNU Carroll, FNU Goodwine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
