Cases 11 - 20 of 104
Curry v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Polk County)
as 8:2023cv01470
Petitioner:
Runnell Deshay Curry
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chau v. Norris et al
as 8:2023cv01273
Defendant:
Detective Jonathan Norris, Blake and Detective Richard Curry, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Cuong Man Chau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUNGE v. DESANTIS et al
as 5:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
LARRY RUNGE
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, RICKY DIXON, HEATH HOLLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
THOMAS v. HILL et al
as 4:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
RUSS G THOMAS
Defendant:
HILL, BEARDEN, DARVESY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
TANNER v. FRENCH et al
as 3:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant:
FRENCH, CURRY and SKRUBBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Ross et al
as 9:2022cv81617
Plaintiff:
Chester Lee Robinson
Defendant:
Deputy Elijah Ross, Dennis Brubaker, Kowana Alfred and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Neill v. Griffis et al
as 3:2022cv00904
Plaintiff:
Cash Aaron O'Neill
Defendant:
Garret Jason Griffis, Christopher Walker, Mike Hauge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. United States of America
as 9:2022cv80870
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Donte Curry
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
