Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Wilson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2016cv02727
Petitioner:
John David Wilson, Jr
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wilson v. McFadden
as 8:2016cv02025
Plaintiff:
John David Wilson, Jr
Defendant:
Andrea McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 8:2016cv01369
Petitioner:
John David Wilson, Jr
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2015cv02084
Petitioner:
John David Wilson, Jr
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson, Jr. v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 8:2015cv01207
Plaintiff:
John David Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson, Jr. v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 6:2015cv00804
Plaintiff:
John David Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. United States of America
as 9:2014cv80126
Plaintiff:
David Wilson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wilson v. Miami-Dade Department of Corrections
as 1:2013cv23778
Plaintiff:
David Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
Miami-Dade Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. City of Tampa Police Department et al
as 8:2011cv02535
Plaintiff:
John David Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Tampa Police Department, Officer Reginald Williams, Patricia Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. John E. Goode Pretrial Detention Facility
as 3:2009cv01047
Plaintiff:
Skot David Wilson
Defendant:
John E. Goode Pretrial Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
