Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Tuten v. Nocco, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2021cv02397
Plaintiff: Terry Burdette Tuten
Defendant: Chris Nocco, Home Wav L.L.C, Officer J. Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONCEPCION-PADILLA v. MAY et al
as 5:2021cv00167
Plaintiff: RICARDO CONCEPCION-PADILLA
Defendant: WARDEN, SCOTT MAY, SHULA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Attorney General Trump Admin et al
as 5:2021cv00235
Defendant: A.W. Graphton, FNU Lee, John Doe and others
Plaintiff: David S.L. Parks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GIBSON v. NORTH FLORIDA RECEPTION MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 6:2020cv00980
Defendant: Walker, Hamilton CI (Anx), Apalachee CI and others
Plaintiff: Ernest R. Gibson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. NORTH FLORIDA RECEPTION MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 1:2020cv00115
Defendant: MD LOPEZ-PADILLA, NORTH FLORIDA RECEPTION MEDICAL CENTER, ACI WALKER and others
Plaintiff: ERNEST R GIBSON, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Concepcion-Padilla v. Johnson et al
as 5:2019cv00620
Plaintiff: Ricardo Concepcion-Padilla
Defendant: FNU Johnson, FNU Henderson, FNU Faira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Burston et al
as 8:2019cv02806
Defendant: Majenta Loperena, Paolo Perez-Bazan, Melvin Burston, Jr. and others
Plaintiff: Michael Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. United States of America
as 8:2019cv02156
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: William Padilla Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Concepcion-Padilla v. Vargas
as 6:2018cv01438
Plaintiff: Ricardo Concepcion-Padilla
Defendant: A. Vargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carpenter v. Denning et al
as 6:2017cv01776
Plaintiff: Carl M. Carpenter
Defendant: Jason Denning and Joseph Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?