Cases 11 - 20 of 1,551
Schaefer v. Warden, Coleman USP
as 5:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Glass v. USP Victorville
as 1:2024cv01372
Petitioner:
Donald Glass
Defendant:
USP Victorville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Warden, USP Coleman 2
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Denny Ray Anderson
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Richardson v. Warden, USP Coleman I
as 5:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Jerome Richardson
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ulmer v. Warden, USP Coleman II
as 5:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Jerry Ben Ulmer
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Marshall Williams v. FCC Coleman - USP I Warden
as 23-14232
Petitioner:
MARSHALL DEWAYNE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
FCC COLEMAN - USP I WARDEN
Schaefer v. Warden, Coleman USP
as 6:2024cv00324
Petitioner:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Respondent:
Warden, Coleman USP and Warden, USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Benjamin v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2024cv00019
Petitioner:
Johnny C. Benjamin, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lawson v. Warden FCC Coleman
as 5:2023cv00723
Petitioner:
Willie Lawson
Respondent:
Warden FCC Coleman and Warden FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Amos v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Harold Ray Amos
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
