Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Chandler v. United States of America
as 0:2018cv62338
Plaintiff:
Semia Gupton Chandler
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wolfe v. Public Defender's Office, 20th Judicial Circuit et al
as 2:2018cv00609
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michael Chandler Wolfe
Defendant:
Kathleen A. Smith and Public Defender's Office, 20th Judicial Circuit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfe et al v. Florida Attorney General Office et al
as 2:2018cv00589
Defendant:
Florida Attorney General Office, State of Florida, State Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michael Chandler Wolfe, Anthony Dakota Andrews and Edwin Ledesma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gupton-Chandler v. United States of America
as 0:2017cv62304
Plaintiff:
Semia Gupton-Chandler
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chandler v. United States of America
as 0:2017cv62244
Plaintiff:
Semia Gupton Chandler
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RODRIGUEZ v. BRENDALIZ et al
as 3:2017cv00155
Plaintiff:
JOSE M RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
ASCENCIO BRENDALIZ, S CHANDLER, SIMMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANDLER v. WOOD et al
as 4:2016cv00772
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LASHUN CHANDLER
Defendant:
MIKE WOOD and KIMBERLY PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. United States of America
as 0:2016cv61515
Petitioner:
Dondrell Joseph Chandler, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. State of Florida et al
as 6:2015cv01601
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
State of Florida, Volusia County Corrections Department, Marylynn Chandler Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. CRAWFORD et al.
as 3:2015cv00368
Plaintiff:
NATHAN CHARLES JONES
Defendant:
MARK CRAWFORD, EBONY O HARVEY, VILCHEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
