Cases 21 - 30 of 1,154
Jones v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Brian Jones
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Marmol Vallejo v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 8:2024cv00594
Petitioner:
Fredy Donaldo Marmol Vallejo
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Melendez v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 8:2024cv00597
Petitioner:
Carlos Melendez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Melendez v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 5:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
Carlos Melendez
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rincon-Puello v. Warden - FCC Coleman Low
as 8:2024cv00598
Petitioner:
Juan Rincon-Puello
Respondent:
Warden - FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Marmol Vallejo v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 5:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Fredy Donaldo Marmol Vallejo
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rincon-Puello v. Warden - FCC Coleman Low
as 5:2024cv00124
Petitioner:
Juan Rincon-Puello
Respondent:
Warden - FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James Graham v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 24-10642
Petitioner:
JAMES MARTIN GRAHAM
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - LOW
LOWE v. USA
as 5:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
REGINALD LOWE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Davidovic v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Ronald Davidovic
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
