Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Mattox v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv02248
Petitioner:
Anthony Mattox
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. History of Ola Mae Maddox et al
as 6:2016cv00772
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
History of Ola Mae Maddox, Charles Morrow Priest, Zorada Mae Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Brown et al
as 1:2013cv02276
Plaintiff:
Casey Telensky Thomas
Defendant:
Thomas Brown, Aikins, Dickerson and others
Mattox v. USA
as 3:2012cv90148
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
OMAR SHARIFF MATTOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mattox v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv00022
Petitioner:
Larry Mattox
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anthony Mattox v. USA
as 11-15161
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY MATTOX
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mattox v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv02482
Petitioner:
Anthony Mattox
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Larry Mattox v. Secretary, Dept. of Correction, et al
as 10-11259
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY MATTOX
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Mattox v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2009cv00377
Petitioner:
Larry Mattox
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chase et al v. Edwards et al
as 3:2008cv00039
Plaintiff:
Jamie Jean Chase, Bryson Powers, Benjamin Tyrone Zellars and others
Defendant:
Ira Edwards, Jr., Clarke County Commissioners and Heidi Davison
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
