Cases 31 - 40 of 170
Flores v. Miami Dade County Corrections and Rehabilitation Department Pretrial Detention Center
as 1:2021cv23742
Plaintiff:
Carlos Antonio Flores
Defendant:
Miami Dade County Corrections and Rehabilitation Department Pretrial Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2021cv23257
Plaintiff:
Lazaro A. Flores
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alvarez Flores v. United States of America
as 0:2021cv61649
Plaintiff:
Henry Onel Alvarez Flores
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CHESTNUT v. LEAVINS
as 3:2021cv00827
Plaintiff:
GERNARD DENEZ CHESTNUT
Defendant:
DONALD LEAVINS, ROESKE, TRUMBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez-Flores v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al( Orange County)
as 6:2021cv00957
Petitioner:
Jose A. Perez-Flores and Jose Alejandro Perez-Flores
Respondent:
Florida Department of Corrections Secretary, Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACKSON v. INCH
as 3:2021cv00732
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS MARSHALL JACKSON
Defendant:
MARK INCH, W CLEMMONS, R FLORES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. FLORES et al
as 3:2021cv00509
Defendant:
MARK INCH, FLA DEPT CORRECTIONS, JONES and others
Plaintiff:
IVIN ROMON RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUGUSTINE v. INCH et al
as 4:2021cv00123
Defendant:
MARK INCH, DAVIS, BAINE and others
Plaintiff:
JULIO AUGUSTINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAMBERT v. HUGHES et al
as 3:2020cv06024
Defendant:
OFFICER SHAW, A FLORES, DEVINE and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC W LAMBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. INCH
as 3:2020cv05935
Plaintiff:
LAVAROS DAVIS
Defendant:
MARK INCH, KNOYOSEDO, JANE DOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
