Cases 31 - 40 of 545
Morris v. Centrion et al
as 3:2023cv00762
Plaintiff:
Arealeus Morris
Defendant:
Centrion, Dr. Figrola, Nurse North and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SLACK v. HALFORD et al
as 3:2023cv13070
Plaintiff:
DIAMOND KANIEL SLACK
Defendant:
HALFORD, BELL, T ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AKINS v. SALTER et al
as 5:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
WILLIE J AKINS
Defendant:
G SALTER, JAKE G DANIELS and WALTER ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Peete et al
as 9:2023cv80848
Plaintiff:
Chester L. Robinson
Defendant:
Sergeant Jermesha Peete, Sergeant Karwaski, Leading Sheriff of Palm Beach County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schock v. Hoffman et al
as 8:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Arnold Schock
Defendant:
Kurt A. Hoffman and Punthika Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinner v. Perkins et al
as 3:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Timmy Kinner
Defendant:
Mark Perkins, Bernard Reed, Tyler Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaston v. City of Leesburg et al
as 5:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Angel E. Gaston
Defendant:
City of Leesburg, Lake County, Florida, Peyton C. Grinell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. McKire et al
as 3:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Shaquila D. Robinson
Defendant:
Antony McKire and Angelion Williams Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2023cv00030
Petitioner:
Travis Robinson
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
