Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Williams v. Unnamed Defendant
as 1:2015cv04202
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Williams
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant and Cobb Co. Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowery v. Tyson et al
as 1:2015cv02431
Plaintiff:
Abdulhakim Salaam Lowery
Defendant:
Tyson, Pickett, Randy Shirley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damien Balark v. Cobb County Adult Detention Ce
as 15-12666
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIEN M. BALARK
Defendant - Appellee:
COBB COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER
Green v. Cobb County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2015cv01723
Plaintiff:
Ancely Faye Green
Defendant:
Cobb County Adult Detention Center, Kennestone Hospital, The State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank Savannah v. Cobb County Adult Detention Ce, et al
as 15-11610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK SAVANNAH
Defendant - Appellee:
COBB COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER, NEIL WARREN and EMILY STANLEY
Bishop v. Cobb County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2015cv00678
Plaintiff:
Michael Bishop
Defendant:
Cobb County Adult Detention Center, Neil Warren and Emily Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rayner v. Cobb County et al
as 1:2015cv00501
Plaintiff:
Barry W. Rayner
Defendant:
Cobb County, Cobb County Adult Detention Center, Donald L. Bartlett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Cox et al
as 1:2015cv00296
Petitioner:
Michael Bishop
Respondent:
Cox and Cobb County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Savannah v. Cobb County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2015cv00246
Plaintiff:
Frank Savannah
Defendant:
Cobb County Adult Detention Center, Neil Warren and Emily Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller v. Cobb County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2014cv03402
Petitioner:
Sterling T. Fuller
Respondent:
Cobb County Adult Detention Center and Neil Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
