Cases 31 - 40 of 337
CARTER v. NAPLES JAIL CENTER
as 3:2022cv23538
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. CARTER
Defendant:
NAPLES JAIL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Dixon
as 3:2022cv01372
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Carter
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Sherman et al
as 8:2022cv02667
Plaintiff:
Charlie Carter, III
Defendant:
Robin Sherman, Christina Latham, Bryan Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Dusnik et al
as 8:2022cv02605
Plaintiff:
Charlie Carter, III
Defendant:
Ashley Dusnik, Ed Brodsky, Anne Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Naples Jail Center
as 8:2022cv02609
Plaintiff:
John C. Carter
Defendant:
Naples Jail Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Naples Jail Center et al
as 2:2022cv00731
Plaintiff:
John C. Carter
Defendant:
Naples Jail Center and Naples Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Sherman et al
as 8:2022cv02604
Plaintiff:
Charlie Carter, III
Defendant:
Robin Sherman, Christina Latham, Bryan Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cater v. Zaid et al
as 3:2022cv01233
Plaintiff:
John Cory Cater and John Cary Carter
Defendant:
Jerome Bernard Zaid, T. Keener and Wengart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Secretary of Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00595
Petitioner:
Kendell Letroy Carter
Respondent:
Secretary of Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. Polk et al
as 3:2022cv00884
Plaintiff:
James L. Kelly
Defendant:
R. Polk, J. Carter, T. North and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
