Cases 41 - 50 of 77,722
KESSLER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00250
Petitioner:
PHILLIP KESSLER
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pullen v. Centurion Healthcare et al
as 3:2024cv00632
Plaintiff:
Allen Pullen
Defendant:
Centurion Healthcare, T. Bowden and S. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivas Nunez v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv01133
Petitioner:
Tauri Benjamin Rivas Nunez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
CULL v. USA
as 4:2024cv00251
Petitioner:
LEONARD CULL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mason v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hernando)
as 8:2024cv01491
Petitioner:
George Mason
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marquetti v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2024cv01497
Petitioner:
Leonel Marquetti
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reeves v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2024cv01492
Plaintiff:
William Morgan Reeves, III
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Christopher Briddel, Chief Florida Inspector General Central Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grushko v. United States Of America
as 1:2024cv22405
Plaintiff:
Denis Grushko
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Burgos
as 0:2024cv61076
Petitioner:
Badi Burgos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KROFT v. WALKER et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Defendant:
JIMMY LEE KROFT, WALKER, COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
