Cases 41 - 50 of 479
Adams v. West et al
as 3:2022cv01270
Plaintiff:
Lee Frank Adams
Defendant:
Dr. West, Nurse Perry, Lieutenant Aiken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rahaim v. Burke et al
as 8:2022cv02448
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Rahaim
Defendant:
Ken Burke, James Large, Diana Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Ross et al
as 9:2022cv81617
Plaintiff:
Chester Lee Robinson
Defendant:
Deputy Elijah Ross, Dennis Brubaker, Kowana Alfred and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Florida State Prison
as 3:2022cv01107
Plaintiff:
Lee Frank Adams
Defendant:
Florida State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00997
Plaintiff:
DONNY PHILLIPS
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Centurion, MHM Health Professionals LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. HUDGINS et al
as 5:2022cv00207
Petitioner:
SAUNDRA L. WHITE and SAUNDRA L WHITE
Respondent:
HUDGINS, P. ADAMS, LORI SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Meyer v. U.S. Probation Office
as 3:2022cv00978
Petitioner:
Adam Howard Meyer
Respondent:
U.S. Probation Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robinson v. Herring et al
as 9:2022cv81379
Plaintiff:
Chester Lee Robinson
Defendant:
Quancia Herring, Norris Fuse, Adam Ballau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. NEAL et al
as 3:2022cv16791
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY L WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
NEAL, C NEELY, R DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
