Cases 41 - 50 of 303
Lakes v. Smith
as 1:2022cv03634
Petitioner:
Corey Lakes
Respondent:
Tarmarshe Smith and Christopher Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PITTS v. SMITH et al
as 5:2022cv00363
Plaintiff:
GEORGE W PITTS, JR
Defendant:
JUDGE ARTHUR L SMITH, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY STACEY JACKSON, LAW CLERK CAROLINE C KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHANEY v. ADAMS et al
as 5:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JEROME CHANEY, JR
Defendant:
JHONATHON L ADAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL CHRISTOPHER M CARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mansfield v. Morris et al
as 1:2022cv03686
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Wesley Mansfield
Defendant:
Lieutenant Morris, Lieutenant Carr, Deputy Stallcup and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bruton v. Berry
as 1:2022cv02960
Petitioner:
Glenn Bruton
Respondent:
Walter Berry and Christopher M. Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv02875
Petitioner:
Robert Davis
Respondent:
State of Georgia, Georgia Attorney Gen Christopher M. Carr and Warden Jacob Beasley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David v. Carr
as 1:2022cv02892
Plaintiff:
Deonta David
Defendant:
Chris Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. ADAMS et al
as 3:2022cv09570
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY L WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
J ADAMS, WALKER CLEMMONS, PARROT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle v. Carr et al
as 1:2022cv02761
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Battle
Defendant:
Chris Carr, Paula K. Smith, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wymer v. Kemp et al
as 1:2022cv02295
Plaintiff:
James Wymer
Defendant:
Gov. Brain Kemp and AG Chris Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
