Cases 41 - 50 of 309
Murzike v. Spear et al
as 3:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
Spear, Carr, JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliphant v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00054
Petitioner:
Rashard S. Oliphant
Respondent:
Mike Williams and Lenny Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Avakian v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00052
Petitioner:
Nerses Hratch Avakian
Respondent:
Mike Williams and Lenny Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yatsenko v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00051
Petitioner:
Anton V. Yatsenko
Respondent:
Mike Williams and Lenny Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Currie v. Florida Commission On Offender Review
as 1:2022cv20130
Plaintiff:
Jack Thomas Currie
Defendant:
Florida Commission On Offender Review
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Curry v. State of Florida
as 3:2021cv01278
Plaintiff:
James Prescott Curry
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TANNER v. FRENCH et al
as 3:2021cv04644
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant:
FRENCH, CURRY, SKRUBBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higginbotham v. Johnson et al
as 5:2021cv00587
Plaintiff:
Kevin Higginbotham
Defendant:
FNU Johnson, FNU MacMiller and FNU Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURRY v. INCH
as 5:2021cv00199
Petitioner:
Dayeisha Curry
Defendant:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Respondent:
MARK INCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curry v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv00476
Petitioner:
Dayeisha Curry
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
