Cases 41 - 50 of 1,547
Robert Conyers, Jr. v. Ayers FNU, et al
as 23-12898
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CONYERS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
AYERS FNU, KITCHEN FNU, PERKINS FNU and others
Keith Logan v. FCC Coleman - USP II Warden
as 23-12888
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEITH LOGAN
Respondent / Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN - USP II WARDEN
Eduardo Bonilla v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 23-12844
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDUARDO BONILLA
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP II
Castillo v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2023cv00525
Petitioner:
Charlie Henry Castillo, Charles Henry Castillo and Joe King
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wingfield v. Warden, USP Coleman 1
as 5:2023cv00506
Petitioner:
James Wingfield
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2023cv00423
Petitioner:
Chedrick V. Brown
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hernandez v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2023cv00407
Petitioner:
Manuel David Hernandez
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Scott v. Warden, FCC Coleman-USP 2
as 5:2023cv00386
Petitioner:
Erwin Scott
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-USP 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harris v. Warden, FCC Coleman USP 1
as 5:2023cv00366
Petitioner:
Robert Marvin Harris
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman USP 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. Warden, FCC Coleman USP 1
as 5:2023cv00363
Petitioner:
Dwayne A Davis, Jr
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman USP 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
