Cases 51 - 60 of 77,747
Kirkland, Alfred v. Ziegler et al
as 1:2024cv22396
Plaintiff:
Alfred Kirkland
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Ziegler, Captain Etienne, Sergeant Chance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv14199
Plaintiff:
Jason Reaves
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange County)
as 6:2024cv01144
Petitioner:
Clovis Costell Moss, Jr
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CULL v. USA
as 4:2024cv00251
Petitioner:
LEONARD CULL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
NORDQUIST v. POLISHNOWSKI
as 3:2024cv00285
Petitioner:
ERIC JOSEPH NORDQUIST
Respondent:
JOHN POLISHNOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KESSLER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00250
Petitioner:
PHILLIP KESSLER
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DELICES v. TUCKER
as 3:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
VILES DELICES
Defendant:
PRESTON TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grushko v. United States Of America
as 1:2024cv22405
Plaintiff:
Denis Grushko
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Badi Burgos v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2024cv61077
Plaintiff:
Badi Burgos
Defendant:
SECRETARY FLA. DEPT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
