Cases 61 - 70 of 81
Steven McLeod v. Corizon Health, Inc., et al
as 15-12967
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN A. MCLEOD
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN and others
HOGARTH v. CORIZON HEALTH INC
as 3:2015cv00292
Plaintiff:
KEITH ERROL HOGARTH
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELLS v. HO et al
as 3:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
MARVIN WELLS
Defendant:
ALLEN HO, JULIE JONES, CORIZON HEALTH INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCLEOD v. CORIZON HEALTH INC
as 4:2015cv00211
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A MCLEOD
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH INC, JULIE JONES, MICHAEL CREWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCLEOD v. JONES
as 4:2015cv00188
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A MCLEOD
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, MICHAEL CREWS, CORIZON HEALTH INC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven McLeod v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 15-10851
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN A. MCLEOD
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HUDSON, Assistant Warden of Operations-DOC, CORIZON HEALTH INC., Private Medical Provider and others
Cleveland v. Charlotte County Jail et al
as 2:2015cv00039
Plaintiff:
Bo Cleveland
Defendant:
Charlotte County Jail, Corizon Health, Inc., William Prummell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATHIS v. CORIZON HEALTH INC et al
as 3:2014cv00469
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN MATHIS
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH INC, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCHWARTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWEN v. CORIZON HEALTH INC et al
as 4:2014cv00460
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E OWEN
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH INC, B BOYD, UNIDENTIFIED PHYSICIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannady v. Prumell et al
as 2:2014cv00440
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Cannady
Defendant:
William Prumell, Fred Starks and Corizon Health Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
