Cases 61 - 70 of 166
Marrissette v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 6:2017cv00405
Plaintiff:
Marrissette
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents, Barack Obama and Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 6:2017cv00397
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents, Barack Obama and Donald Trump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palache v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 6:2017cv00403
Plaintiff:
Palache
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Mr. President of the United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aros v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 6:2017cv00409
Plaintiff:
Aros
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Mr. President of the United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TODD v. SIX UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF NARCOTICS ET AL
as 5:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
JEROME EUGENE TODD
Defendant:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF NARCOTICS, MAURICE M PAUL, ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sarokim v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 6:2017cv00295
Plaintiff:
Jeugini Sarokim
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and President of the United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sum v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 6:2017cv00294
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sum
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Mr. President of the United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young Jo, et al v. Six Unknown Names Agents or Mr
as 16-16703
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO and JAIMES ENRIQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS OR MR. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, BARACK OBAMA
Rodriguez v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 6:2016cv00895
Petitioner:
Rodriguez
Respondent:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosas v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 6:2016cv00884
Plaintiff:
Rosas
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
