Cases 61 - 70 of 159,577
DUNN v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
CLEVELAND DUNN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, DEPUTY WARDEN JEFFREY FARMER, ASST COMMISSIONER RANDY SAULS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hahn v. Kasper
as 1:2024cv04209
Petitioner:
James Patrick Hahn
Respondent:
Jeanie Kasper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Greene v. Smith
as 1:2024cv04207
Plaintiff:
Dustin Michael Greene
Defendant:
Chuck Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SURDAKOWSKI v. DIXON et al
as 5:2024cv00216
Defendant:
E JONES, C M CACCAMIS, T MILLS and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SURDAKOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pico Romero v. Diaz et al
as 0:2024cv61714
Defendant:
Garrett Ripa, Mitchell Diaz, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Petitioner:
Yesica Pico Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Machim, James v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv14307
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Machim
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore, Stacey v. State of Florida
as 0:2024cv61710
Plaintiff:
Stacey D. Moore
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01685
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01686
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Graham v. Bruce et al
as 2:2024cv00834
Defendant:
Kyle Bruce, Erin Hughes, Gregory Hardenfelder and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin O. Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
