Cases 71 - 80 of 779
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv21555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv60610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv60611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Akerele v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al
as 5:2022cv00013
Petitioner:
Segun Akerele
Respondent:
Homeland Security Ice, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv20594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv60364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Action to compel U.S. officer to perform duty
Delancy v. Barr et al
as 3:2022cv00034
Petitioner:
Stanekio Delancy
Respondent:
William P. Barr, Chad Wolf, Michael Meade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Diarra v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Dekalb/Cobb County and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Diarra v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2021cv24468
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Dekalb/Cobb County and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stapleton v. Quinones et al
as 9:2021cv82547
Plaintiff:
Michael Stapleton
Defendant:
Agent Francisco Quinones, District Attorney Office and Department of Homeland Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
