Cases 81 - 90 of 1,858
Pringle v. Officer Strachan et al
as 6:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
James I Pringle
Defendant:
Officer Strachan, John Doe, Officer John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes, Marquise v. Sergeant Dixon et al
as 1:2024cv20880
Plaintiff:
Marquise Haynes
Defendant:
Sergeant Dixon, Officer Vasquez, Officer Triplet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. DOE et al
as 4:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and WAKULLA CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Doe I et al
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Ricky Butler
Defendant:
John Doe I, John Doe II and FNU Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jackson-Bey v. Carlton et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Shakeel Jhakeel Jacksonbey and Haneef Shakeel Jackson-Bey
Defendant:
E.K. Carlton, J. Burkett, FNU Cordero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sheffield v. Dixon et al
as 8:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Lance Javon Sheffield
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, John Doe, Warden DeBell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harpo-Brown v. FNU et al
as 5:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Defendant:
Gunther FNU, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giles v. Jane Does 1-2
as 6:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lamar Giles
Defendant:
Jane Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Jay et al
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
B. Jay, M. Germaine, K. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TIERNEY v. SCRUGGS et al
as 3:2023cv24768
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M TIERNEY
Defendant:
SCRUGGS, B WENTZ, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
