Cases 1 - 10 of 597
Riquene v. FCI Oakdale
as 3:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Martinez Riquene
Defendant:
FCI Oakdale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Martinez Mayorga v. Meade et al
as 1:2024cv22128
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alonso Martinez Mayorga
Defendant:
Michael W. Meade, Susan Dunbar, Patrick J Leckleitner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martinez Mayorga v. Meade et al
as 1:2024cv22129
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alonso Martinez Mayorga
Defendant:
Director Michael W. Meade, Susan Dunbar, Patrick J Leckleitner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martinez v. Meade et al
as 1:2024cv22131
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alfonso Martinez
Defendant:
Director Michael W. Meade, Susan Dunbar, Patrick J Leckleitner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Joe Martinez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 24-11555
Petitioner:
JOE MARTINEZ
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Pruitt, Brandon D. v. Judge Cabarga et al
as 1:2024cv21860
Plaintiff:
Brandon Demon Pruitt
Defendant:
Judge Cabarga, Office of Public Defender Carlos J. Martinez, Katherine Rundle Fernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz, Pavel M. v. State of Florida
as 4:2024cv10042
Plaintiff:
Pavel Martinez Ruiz
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alphonso Tanner v. French, et al
as 24-11098
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant:
FRENCH, CURRY, SKKRUBS and others
MARTINEZ v. LESLIE et al
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
DIEGO C. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
ZAKARY LESLIE and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
