Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Faouzi Jaber v. W. Rodriguez, et al
as 24-11970
Plaintiff:
FAOUZI ABDUL-MENHEM JABER
Defendant:
W. RODRIGUEZ, A. CHRISTIAN, FNU LOPEZ and others
Shabazz v. Welch et al
as 8:2024cv01058
Plaintiff:
Abdul Hakeem Jahmal Naseer Shabazz and Owen D. Denson
Defendant:
Assitant Warden C. Welch, Assistant Warden A. Williams, Toni Bowden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaber v. Rodriguez et al
as 5:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Faquzi Abdul-Menhem Jaber and Faouzi Abdul-Menhem Jaber
Defendant:
W. Rodriguez, A. Christian, FNU Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ABDUL v. CONNER
as 1:2024cv21068
Plaintiff:
JABBAAR MUHAAHID ABDUL
Defendant:
Robert Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ABDUL v. CONNER
as 4:2024cv00082
Petitioner:
JABBAAR MUHAAHID ABDUL and JABBAAR MUJAAHID ABDUL
Respondent:
ROBERT CONNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ali v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00108
Petitioner:
Abdul Jamal Ali
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jaber v. Rodriguez et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Faouzi Abdul-Menhem Jaber
Defendant:
W. Rodriguez, Salem Warden, A. Christian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Crawford v. Jones
as 4:2023cv00241
Petitioner:
Abdul Crawford
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crawford v. Jones
as 1:2023cv04946
Petitioner:
Abdul Crawford
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Muhammad v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2023cv00594
Petitioner:
Abdul Farid Muhammad
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
