Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Florida
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Smith v. State Attorney et al
as 6:2017cv00970
Plaintiff: Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant: State Attorney, Andrew Reed, Charles Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kearns v. Roberts
as 6:2016cv01446
Plaintiff: Joseph W. Kearns
Defendant: Charles Roberts and State Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lester v. Morales
as 5:2016cv00258
Plaintiff: Charles Robert Lester
Defendant: Edgar Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Robert et al
as 6:2016cv00326
Plaintiff: Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant: Charles Robert, State Attorney and Andrew Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCullough v. Bendekovic
as 5:2014cv00520
Plaintiff: Ryan McCullough
Defendant: Ronald F. Bendekovic and Charles Robert Holloman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SADLER v. MORGAN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00199
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY RAY SADLER
Defendant: MARGUERITE MORGAN, V ALBERTS, MARCELLUS TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wernicke v. Corizon Health Care Services et al
as 2:2014cv00036
Plaintiff: Charles Robert Wernicke
Defendant: Corizon Health Care Services, William Cameron, William Prummell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wernicke v. Corizon Health Care Services et al
as 2:2012cv00579
Plaintiff: Charles Robert Wernicke
Defendant: Corizon Health Care Services and Charlotte County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. State of Florida
as 1:2010cv23558
Plaintiff: Charles Roberts
Defendant: State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chapman v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv00539
Petitioner: Charles Robert Chapman
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?