Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Sneed v. Persad et al
as 2:2024cv14169
Plaintiff:
Jerry Sneed
Defendant:
Devanard Persad, Cory Gitlin, Zach Ferrira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton, Kevin L. v. Ardon et al
as 2:2024cv14149
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamont Hamilton
Defendant:
Tony Ardon, Tyler Ludlow and Sheriff William D. Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Sneed v. Sheriff Snyder et al
as 2:2023cv14402
Plaintiff:
Jerry Sneed
Defendant:
William D. Snyder, Benjamin Vuleta and Devanand Persad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Snyder
as 2:2023cv14271
Plaintiff:
Jamin Ryan Ford
Defendant:
William D. Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Cases
Bargmon v. Armor Correctional Health et al
as 2:2022cv14127
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bargmon
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health, Matthew Peebles, Violet Faria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Steel et al
as 2:2022cv14088
Plaintiff:
Damion J. Stone
Defendant:
Darren Steel and William D. Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Griffin v. Snyder et al
as 2:2021cv00445
Defendant:
Mark Inch, W. Millette, K. McClay and others
Plaintiff:
Reggie Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mirucki v. Martin County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2021cv14193
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff Steven Craig Cranmer, Armor Correctional Health, Inc., Martin County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Mirucki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flood v. Snyder
as 2:2021cv14169
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Donnell Flood, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff William D. Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flood v. Snyder
as 2:2021cv14163
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Donnell Flood, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff William D. Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
