Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Duffy v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv04496
Petitioner:
Jermaine Charles Duffy
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Montgomery v. Duffie et al
as 1:2023cv02268
Plaintiff:
Sherrod Montgomery
Defendant:
Officer Drew Duffie, Investigator Kimberly Biggs, Corporal Sam Hack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Duffie et al
as 3:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Sherrod Montgomery
Defendant:
Officer Drew Duffie, Investigator Kimberly Biggs, Corporal Sam Hack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Duffy et al
as 1:2022cv03175
Plaintiff:
Marlon J. Green
Defendant:
Jason Duffy, Ken Noble, Chelsea Napolean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2021cv05176
Plaintiff:
Jamil Rasul Bey
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Charles D. Baker, Karyn E. Polito and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duffy v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv02204
Petitioner:
Jermaine Charles Duffy
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Crawford v. Suddaby et al
as 1:2016cv00246
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
G. Suddaby, Tohenberg, William Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv04005
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duffy v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv02529
Petitioner:
Jermaine Charles Duffy
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sutcliffe v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv02310
Plaintiff:
John E. Sutcliffe
Defendant:
William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
