Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Peterson v. Lee County Sheriff et al
as 2:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Jessie James Peterson, Jr.
Defendant:
Lee County Sheriff, Dave Jennings, Justine Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blackhall v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Marion County)
as 5:2023cv00280
Petitioner:
Jessie James Blackhall
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blackhall v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2021cv02046
Petitioner:
Jessie James Blackhall
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gibson v. Daniels et al
as 3:2021cv00744
Plaintiff:
Jessie James Gibson, Jr.
Defendant:
Lieutenant Ronnie Daniels and Lieutenant C. May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack, Jr. v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2020cv01507
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Jessie James Mack, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gregg v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv23844
Plaintiff:
Jessie James Gregg
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
WHIGHAM v. EVE
as 5:2008cv00175
Plaintiff:
JESSIE JAMES WHIGHAM
Defendant:
MS EVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHIGHAM v. EVE
as 5:2008cv00082
Plaintiff:
JESSIE JAMES WHIGHAM
Defendant:
EVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHIGHAM v. EVE
as 5:2008cv00051
Plaintiff:
JESSIE JAMES WHIGHAM
Defendant:
EVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHIGHAM v. MS DONNA
as 5:2008cv00028
Plaintiff:
JESSIE JAMES WHIGHAM
Defendant:
DONNA and THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
