Cases 1 - 10 of 2,466
EVANS v. DOE et al
as 3:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
DENZEL EVANS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bless, Alfredo v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2024cv80636
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Bless and Alfredo -a- Bless
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office, The Palm Beach County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Doe
as 8:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Corey M. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Gorbey v. Brian Davis, et al
as 24-11527
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
BRIAN J. DAVIS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISIONS, JOHN DOE #1 and others
CHAMBERS v. NICOLAS et al
as 3:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
KEION NATHANIEL CHAMBERS
Defendant:
C NICOLAS and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CADEJUSTE v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
MARCO THONY CADEJUSTE
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, Z CULPEPPER and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheffield v. Doe et al
as 8:2024cv01150
Plaintiff:
Lance Javon Sheffield
Defendant:
John Doe, John or Jane Doe, Sgt. Brittney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpkins v. Wissinger et al
as 5:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Simpkins
Defendant:
FNU Wissinger, FNU McCatherian, Edward Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLESKE v. CHILDS et al
as 4:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE WALLESKE
Defendant:
LARRY CHILDS, RONTERRIOUS WILLIAMS, JOHN DOES 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watson v. Doe et al
as 5:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Pierre Terron Watson
Defendant:
John Doe, S. Jones, A. Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
