Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Daniel Dumond v. L. Rodriguez, et al
as 24-11781
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DUMOND
Defendant:
L. RODRIGUEZ and MIAMI DADE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Daniel Dumond v. L. Rodriguez, et al
as 24-11778
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DUMOND
Defendant:
L. RODRIGUEZ, Miami Dade Police Officer, being sued in official and individual capacities and MIAMI DADE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Dumond, Daniel v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2024cv21301
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dumond
Defendant:
L. Rodriguez and Miami Dade Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Dumond, Daniel v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2024cv21232
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dumond
Defendant:
L. Rodriguez and Miami Dade Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Dumond v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2023cv23110
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dumond
Defendant:
L. Rodriguez, John Doe No.1, John Doe No. 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Dumond v. L. Rodriguez, et al
as 23-11484
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL DUMOND
Defendant / Appellee:
L. RODRIGUEZ and MIAMI-DADE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Ivan Rodriguez v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-10894
Petitioner / Appellant:
IVAN L. RODRIGUEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Dumond v. Miami Dade Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv23967
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dumond
Defendant:
Miami Dade Police Department, Miami Dade Corrections and Rehabilitation, Miami Dade Police Department Kendall District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 3:2022cv22015
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BAILEY
Defendant:
L RODRIGUEZ, BURDETT, AGUIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2022cv14289
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
