Cases 1 - 10 of 2,398
HARRIS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JAMES HARRIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BRYANT v. SIMMONS et al
as 3:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
RONNIE BRYANT
Defendant:
CHIP SIMMONS, MS LESLEY and ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL HEALTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80585
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CUMMINGS v. CRUNK et al
as 4:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
HORACE BENJAMIN CUMMINGS
Defendant:
WILLIAM CRUNK, KASEY M PAYNTER, JAMES R RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Benjamin Oryang v. Waugh, et al
as 24-11287
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN BEDOGWAR ORYANG
Defendant:
WAUGH, PERRYMAN, BELL and others
PRIESTER v. HARRIS et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
DAVID PRIESTER, JAMES THOMAS and DAVID JACKSON
Defendant:
SCOTT S HARRIS, GRANT MALOY, EUGENE GRINBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown II v. Naphcare Healthcare Services et al
as 8:2024cv00936
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wayne Brown, II
Defendant:
Naphcare Healthcare Services and Dr. Ogaga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Wright, III v. Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service
as 24-11202
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
