Cases 1 - 10 of 38
WINGFIELD v. ANDREWS et al
as 5:2024cv00234
Defendant:
JOSHUA ANDREWS and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY BERNARD WINGFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wingfield v. Phams
as 1:2024cv02221
Respondent:
Angela Phams
Petitioner:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wingfield v. Clegg et al
as 1:2024cv02220
Defendant:
Kathy K. Guidry, State of Georgia, Dana Laney and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wingfield v. Pham
as 1:2024cv01877
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Wingfield
Defendant:
Angela Phams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAINES v.WINGFIELD
as 5:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
VINCENT KEITH RAINES
Respondent:
COLETTE PETERS, KEVIN PISTRO, MS BOZEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PESQUIERA v. WINGFIELD
as 5:2023cv00312
Petitioner:
SERGIO PESQUIERA
Respondent:
MARRY WINGFIELD and BARRY WINGFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SANTILLAN v. WINGFIELD
as 5:2023cv00308
Petitioner:
JOE RAMON SANTILLAN
Respondent:
BARRY WINGFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CHEATHAM v. WINGFIELD et al
as 5:2023cv00278
Petitioner:
MELODIE CHEATHAM
Respondent:
A W WINGFIELD and MARIANNA FDC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HILLS v. PISTRO
as 5:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
JESSICA HILLS
Respondent:
PISTRO, WINGFIELD, BOOZEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wingfield v. Warden, FCC Coleman-1
as 5:2023cv00562
Petitioner:
James H Wingfield and James H. Wingfield
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
