Cases 11 - 20 of 95
v. Mendez et al
as 9:2021cv82120
Defendant:
Frankie Mendez and Lynn University, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
ANDINO v. J.E.M. CAPITEL DESIGN CORP. et al
as 1:2020cv25249
Defendant:
J.E.M. CAPITEL DESIGN CORP., JORGE E. MENDEZ, JEM DRYWALL and others
Plaintiff:
ELVIN R. ANDINO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Suros v. Vertilux Limited et al
as 1:2020cv20781
Defendant:
Bernardo Mendez, Vertilux Management, Inc., Jose Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Mercedes Suros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brunett v. Nirvana Health Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2019cv01450
Defendant:
Nirvana Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation Services, LLC, Leo Mendez, Nirvana Health Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Marisa Brunett
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Mendez et al v. RGD Lawn & Landscape, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02891
Defendant:
Greg Dickson, RGD Lawn & Landscape, Inc., Richard T. Brittle, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Aguilar Mendez and Marcos Monzon
Brunett v. Nirvana Health Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2019cv01440
Defendant:
Leo Mendez, Nirvana Health Services, Inc., Sham Maharaj and others
Plaintiff:
Marisa Brunett
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Aguilar Mendez v. RGD Lawn & Landscape, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02011
Defendant:
RGD Lawn & Landscape, Inc. and Greg Dickson
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Aguilar Mendez
Mendez v. RAD Medical Transportation Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv24211
Defendant:
David Diaz and RAD Medical Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Elvis Rafael Mendez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Ikpe v. Kreative Therapy & Rehab Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv23217
Plaintiff:
Eunice Ikpe
Defendant:
Kreative Therapy & Rehab Center, Inc. and Miguel A. Mendez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Mendez v. K & K Ippolito's, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03591
Defendant:
K & K Ippolito's, Inc. and Luis P. Santamaria
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Mendez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
