Cases 31 - 40 of 89
Boles v. Haven Fort Myers, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00650
Plaintiff:
Michael Boles
Defendant:
Haven Fort Myers, LLC , Haven Hospitality Concepts, LLC , EC Squared, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Myers v. Gwinnett County Government
as 1:2016cv00824
Plaintiff:
Crystal Myers
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Government
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Quarles et al v. Above All Tree Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00580
Plaintiff:
David Quarles , James Harrell and Kenneth Ray Myers, Jr.
Defendant:
Above All Tree Service, Inc. and Bryan Perry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Harris v. Fort Myers Hospitality LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00108
Plaintiff:
Sherri Harris
Defendant:
Roberts Hotel Management Fort Myers, LLC, FM Investco, LLC, Steven C. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Myers v. Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. (USA)
as 3:2015cv01364
Plaintiff:
Anthony Myers
Defendant:
Citicorp Credit Services, Inc. (USA)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Myers v. National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund
as 0:2015cv62396
Defendant:
National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund
Plaintiff:
Behnam Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Myers v. Hydraulic Hose of Hillsborough, LLC et al
as 8:2015cv02555
Plaintiff:
Linda M. Myers
Defendant:
Hydraulic Hose of Hillsborough, LLC and Brian O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MYERS v. PREFERRED MANAGING AGENCY INC
as 4:2015cv00496
Plaintiff:
WHITNEY MYERS
Defendant:
PREFERRED MANAGING AGENCY INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Myers v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 1:2015cv23295
Plaintiff:
Mark L. Myers
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Brown v. Myers Auto Group LLC et al
as 9:2015cv81047
Plaintiff:
Lisa Brown
Defendant:
Myers Auto Group LLC and Elizabeth Magner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
