Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Lane v. Armstrong Incorporated et al
as 9:2012cv81152
Plaintiff:
David Lane
Defendant:
Armstrong Incorporated and Robert Charles Armstrong , Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Armstrong v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 8:2012cv02130
Plaintiff:
Lauri Armstrong
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Armstrong et al v. Premier Retail Interiors, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv61594
Plaintiff:
Michelle Armstrong , Orion Barnes , Stephen Bovey and others
Defendant:
Premier Retail Interiors, Inc. and Wingate Advisors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JACKSON v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC
as 5:2012cv00285
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN L JACKSON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Armstrong v. Lipizzaner Stallions, Inc. et al
as 6:2012cv00130
Plaintiff:
Franklin Armstrong
Defendant:
Lipizzaner Stallions, Inc., Gary Lashinsky and Elizabeth Lashinsky
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Armstrong v. Wyle Laboratories, Inc.
as 5:2011cv03981
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Armstrong
Defendant:
Wyle Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dunakin et al v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2011cv22332
Plaintiff:
Ray Dunakin , Daniel D. Fitzgerald , William E. Harilson and others
Defendant:
UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206
DODD et al v. SWIFT TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC
as 3:2011cv00245
Plaintiff:
ELSIE FRANCINE ARMSTRONG and JULIE D DODD
Defendant:
SWIFT TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WADE v. Armstrong Relocation, Florida, LLC.
as 0:2010cv62030
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Wade
Defendant:
Armstrong Relocation, Florida, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Constance Armstrong v. Immuno Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 0:2010cv60925
Plaintiff:
Constance Armstrong
Defendant:
Immuno Laboratories, Inc. and Cheryl Zavik
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
