Cases 41 - 50 of 213
Ramirez v. Rico Pan, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv25241
Plaintiff:
Sandra Ramirez
Defendant:
Liz Caballero, Rico Pan, Inc. and Rafael Perez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Gama et al v. Golden Dragon Inc et al
as 2:2019cv02038
Defendant:
Golden Dragon Inc, Theresia M Go Lee, Rong Seng Chu and others
Plaintiff:
Albino Flores Gama and Mario Reyes Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lugo et al v. P.S.J., Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv24193
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Lugo and Marily Lugo
Defendant:
Isidro Perez, P.S.J., Inc., Hugo Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramirez et al v. Impro Synergies LLC
as 8:2019cv02216
Plaintiff:
HIRAM GONZALEZ and WILFREDO RAMIREZ
Defendant:
Impro Synergies LLC
Not Yet Classified:
Mark A. Hanley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Ramirez v. NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
as 1:2019cv23140
Plaintiff:
Leslie Ramirez
Defendant:
NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Ramirez v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 6:2019cv00809
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
Denise Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Ramirez v. BCN Telecom, Inc.
as 9:2019cv80461
Defendant:
BCN Telecom, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Giovanna Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Ramirez v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
as 8:2019cv00551
Defendant:
Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ramirez v. First Advantage Background Services Corp.
as 8:2019cv00482
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ramirez, et al and Carlos Ramirez
Defendant:
First Advantage Background Services Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Oliva v. Reiter Bunsic Contractors, Inc. et al
as 9:2019cv80254
Plaintiff:
German Oliva, Liosbel Aguila Medina, Jesus Garcia and others
Defendant:
Reiter Bunsic Contractors, Inc., Daniel Reiter, Louis F. Bunsic and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
