Cases 41 - 50 of 126
Cooley et al v. HMR of Alabama, Inc.
as 4:2016cv01432
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Cooley , Heather Adams , Rosie Boyd and others
Defendant:
HMR of Alabama, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kinney et al v. Merchant Data Systems, Inc.
as 1:2016cv22773
Plaintiff:
Katharine Kinney and Stephanie Turner
Defendant:
Merchant Data Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Turner v. Interline Brands, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00646
Plaintiff:
Jamie Turner
Defendant:
Interline Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hawk v. J.R.K. Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01529
Plaintiff:
Danny Hawk , James Kelly , Gregory Powers and others
Defendant:
J.R.K. Trucking, Inc. and Nizam Khan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Jackson et al v. First Student Management LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00557
Plaintiff:
Faith Jackson , Johnnie Thomas , Kimberly Shakir and others
Defendant:
First Student Management LLC and First Student, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Anthony et al v. Concrete Supply Company, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jamie Anthony , Titus Bussey , Marvin Jarrett and others
Defendant:
Concrete Supply Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Turner et al v. Metro Waterproofing, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00728
Plaintiff:
Markedric Turner , Kendrick Norwood and Clifton Pitts
Defendant:
Metro Waterproofing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Turner v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.
as 0:2016cv60219
Plaintiff:
Reginald N. Turner
Defendant:
Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Waxman v. Len-Tran, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv02508
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Waxman
Defendant:
Len-Tran, Inc. and Darrell Turner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Turner v. Tasman Eye Consultants, P.C. et al
as 1:2015cv02897
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Turner
Defendant:
Tasman Eye Consultants, P.C. and Dr. Stuart Tasman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
