Cases 51 - 60 of 120
CALLIER et al v. CEDAR TREE FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00309
Plaintiff:
JUANDA CALLIER , SARAH CARTER , NATRIOUS JACKSON and others
Defendant:
CEDAR TREE FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES, LLC and MICHAEL MILFORD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cooley et al v. HMR of Alabama, Inc.
as 4:2016cv01432
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Cooley , Heather Adams , Rosie Boyd and others
Defendant:
HMR of Alabama, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Anderson et al v. Madison County Board of Education et al
as 5:2016cv01401
Plaintiff:
Janice Anderson , Gaylon Anderson , Dawn Beard and others
Defendant:
Madison County Board of Education, Matt Massey, Angie Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barendse v. House of Wu, LLC
as 2:2016cv00590
Plaintiff:
Sarah Barendse
Defendant:
House of Wu, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Szpendyk v. Transworld Advertising, Inc. et al
as 6:2016cv01085
Plaintiff:
Sarah Szpendyk
Defendant:
Transworld Advertising, Inc. and Teresa R. Burcham
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lima et al v. ALMANIS KOSHER CATERING & BAKERY, INC. et al
as 0:2016cv61008
Plaintiff:
Loida Lima and Mirna Lima
Defendant:
ALMANIS KOSHER CATERING & BAKERY, INC. and Sarah Almani
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Rivera Lalande v. Royal Shell Vacations, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00128
Plaintiff:
Sarah Rivera Lalande
Defendant:
Royal Shell Vacations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Mullins v. Arise Virtual Solutions, Inc.
as 6:2016cv00254
Plaintiff:
Sarah Mullins
Defendant:
Arise Virtual Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bales v. Woodall & Broome, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00444
Plaintiff:
Sarah Bales
Defendant:
Woodall & Broome, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Coleman et al v. Ascenda USA Inc.
as 8:2016cv00040
Plaintiff:
Sarah A. Coleman , Paige Sexton and Laura E. Sexton
Defendant:
Ascenda USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
