Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pritchett et al v. United Parcel Services Inc
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cain Pritchett, Micheal Arnold, Bradley Barkley and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pettway et al v. R L Zeigler Co Inc et al
as 7:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Hazel Pettway, Walter Knox, Archie K Elliott and others
Defendant:
R L Zeigler Co Inc, RL Ziegler Company Inc, Money Purchase Pension Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Smith v. Invisible Waste Services LLC et al
as 0:2018cv62571
Defendant:
VALET LIVING, LLC, Michael Miller and INVISIBLE WASTE SERVICE LLC
Plaintiff:
David Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Vega et al v. Negotiation Credit Services LLC et al
as 0:2016cv61169
Plaintiff:
Yasmin Maria Vega and Gina Marie Ficarrotta
Defendant:
Negotiation Credit Services LLC, Solid Ground Financial LLC., Scott Haick and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Johnson v. Negotiation Credit Services LLC et al
as 0:2015cv62217
Plaintiff:
Jalecia Simone Johnson
Defendant:
Negotiation Credit Services LLC, Scott Haick, David Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Smith v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 3:2013cv01226
Plaintiff:
David Smith
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Smith v. Humana, Inc.
as 6:2013cv01519
Plaintiff:
David Smith
Defendant:
Humana, Inc. and Humana Marketpoint, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Lincare, Inc.
as 8:2009cv02134
Plaintiff:
John David Smith and John David Smith
Defendant:
Lincare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
SMITH v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
as 5:2007cv00060
Plaintiff:
DAVID SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
