Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Berry v. Bailey et al
as 5:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Heath Berry, Jade Baker, Daniel Anderson and others
Defendant:
William C Bailey, Robert E (Bud) Cramer, Jim Scanlon and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
DEYA v. JADE TREE SERVICE CORP et al
as 1:2023cv21600
Plaintiff:
RAYVICK C. DEYA
Defendant:
JADE TREE SERVICE CORP and PEDRO RASCON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
MCKAY-TAYLOR et al v. S1 SECURITY GROUP INC et al
as 0:2019cv63143
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
ROLANDO E. PALMA and S1 SECURITY GROUP INC
Plaintiff:
BRANDON TAYLOR, JENEIA MCKAY-TAYLOR, JADE MCKAY-TAYLOR and others
Defendant:
Maureen McKay-Taylor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Pye v. Carriage Automotive Group, Inc.
as 1:2019cv03951
Defendant:
Carriage Automotive Group, Inc. and Carriage K of Woodstock, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jade Pye
Renaud v. Cream Management & Consulting Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv22791
Defendant:
Cream Management & Consulting Inc. and EDGARDO LAFAURIE
Plaintiff:
Jade A. Renaud
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Jackson v. McKenzie Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv10185
Plaintiff:
Jade Jackson
Defendant:
McKenzie Enterprises, Inc. and Donald McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Caswell v. Pathways Center for Developmental and Behavioral Growth et al
as 3:2015cv00100
Plaintiff:
Justin Caswell
Defendant:
Pathways Center for Developmental and Behavioral Growth and Jade Benefield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Khalil v. Smoke Cheap, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv02884
Plaintiff:
Yousef Khalil
Defendant:
Smoke Cheap, Inc., Monah Zahreddine, Yousef Malkeya and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hill v. Pethel et al
as 1:2014cv02248
Plaintiff:
Michele Hill
Defendant:
Jade Pethel and McVicker & Associates Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
