Cases 141 - 150 of 224
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bannerman et al v. Exclusive Motors Group Corp. et al
as 0:2013cv62425
Plaintiff:
Alexis D. Bannerman and Jamal B. Barr
Defendant:
Exclusive Motors Group Corp. and John Does #1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Sands v. Palm Beach County Sheriff Office et al
as 9:2013cv81031
Defendant:
Palm Beach County Sheriff Office , Beth Rosenthal, David Vitola and others
Plaintiff:
William Sands
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jeannidis v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 1:2013cv23210
Plaintiff:
Anastasios J. Jeannidis
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, JP Morgan Chase National Trust Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc., et al
as 1:2013cv23182
Plaintiff:
Flo & Eddie, Inc.
Defendant:
Sirius XM Radio, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Phan v. Association Financial Services, L.C. et al
as 3:2013cv01032
Plaintiff:
Michael Phan
Defendant:
Association Financial Services, L.C. and Does 1 Through 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
