Cases 11 - 20 of 32
PEREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv25847
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ANTONIO PEREZ
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv92172
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv82290
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. 404 Folsom Glade Road, Rydal, Georgia 30171 et al
as 4:2019mi00003
Defendant:
404 Folsom Glade Road, Rydal, Georgia 30171
Claimant:
Juan Antonio Perez
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
USA v. Marco Perez
as 19-12724
Defendant / Appellant:
MARCO ANTONIO PEREZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Perez Drios v. Crazy Buffet of Florida Inc. et al
as 6:2019cv01148
Plaintiff:
JUAN RAMON PEREZ DRIOS and ANTONIO PEREZ PEREZ
Defendant:
CRAZY BUFFET OF FLORIDA INC, QIAOMING HUANG and Crazy Buffet of Florida Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Perez Perez v. Hokkaido Lake Buena Vista LLC et al
as 6:2019cv01140
Plaintiff:
Antonio Perez Perez
Defendant:
Lin Wan Xing and Hokkaido Lake Buena Vista LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
In re: Antonio O'Bryant
as 17-13542
Petitioner:
In re: ANTONIO PEREZ O'BRYANT
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Perez-Ortiz v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv00853
Petitioner:
Luis Antonio Perez-Ortiz
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Antonio O'Bryant
as 16-17263
Petitioner:
In re: ANTONIO PEREZ O'BRYANT
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
