Cases 11 - 20 of 216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv22882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Alexander v. Burger King Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01414
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation, Premier Kings of Georgia, Inc. and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Adrian Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Angelis v. Burger King Corporation
as 1:2021cv20752
Plaintiff:
Ramon Pompilio Angelis and Pompilio Ramon Angelis
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv20561
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Burger King Corporation v. Darryl Berry, et al
as 21-10180
Defendant / Appellant:
DARRYL B. BERRY and CAPITAL RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BURGER KING CORPORATION
Angelis v. Burger King Corporation
as 1:2021cv20747
Plaintiff:
Ramon Pompilio Angelis
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Angelis v. Burger King Corporation
as 1:2021cv20748
Plaintiff:
Ramon Pompilio Angelis
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Angelis v. Burger King Corporation
as 1:2021cv20750
Plaintiff:
Ramon Pompilio Angelis
Defendant:
Burger King Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jarvis Arrington, et al v. BKW, et al
as 20-13561
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JARVIS ARRINGTON, GENEVA BLANCHARD and SANDRA MUNSTER, c/o Morgan and Morgan 201 North Franklin Street 7th Floor Tampa, FL 33602 813-223-5505
Defendant / Appellee:
RESTAURANT BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC., BURGER KING WORLDWIDE, INC. and BURGER KING CORPORATION
Phillip Williams, et al v. Burger King Corporation
as 20-13128
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALI BEY, CHRISTOPHER MCGEE, MARIE VENTER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BURGER KING CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
