Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 78
CAUDILL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05499
Plaintiff: JEFFERY CAUDILL
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KONO v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04684
Plaintiff: CASEY KONO, DAVID VELASQUEZ, JONATHAN GRIFFITH and others
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CAUDILL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05376
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER CAUDILL
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CAUDILL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03349
Plaintiff: PRESTON WADE CAUDILL
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CAUDILL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01632
Plaintiff: ROBERT CAUDILL, II
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CAUDILL v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06098
Plaintiff: DAVID ALAN CAUDILL
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CAUDILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv68451
Plaintiff: PAUL G CAUDILL
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PRATT-CAUDILL v. SHERIFF OF ESCAMBIA COUNTY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01043
Plaintiff: DAKOTA PRATT-CAUDILL
Defendant: SHERIFF OF ESCAMBIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRATT-CAUDILL v. SHERIFF et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00992
Plaintiff: DAKOTA PRATT-CAUDILL
Defendant: SHERIFF, CHIEF JAILER and BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ESCAMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caudill v. Sanofi SA et al
as 9:2021cv81810
Plaintiff: Sharon Caudill
Defendant: Sanofi SA, Sanofi US Services, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis US LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?